| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 11, No. 5, 599-611 (2008) DOI: 10.1177/1087054707311042 Vestibular Stimulation for ADHDRandomized Controlled Trial of Comprehensive Motion ApparatusOhio State University
Ohio State University, arnold.6{at}osu.edu
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Ohio State University
Objective: This research evaluates effects of vestibular stimulation by Comprehensive Motion Apparatus (CMA) in ADHD. Method: Children ages 6 to 12 (48 boys, 5 girls) with ADHD were randomized to thrice-weekly 30-min treatments for 12 weeks with CMA, stimulating otoliths and semicircular canals, or a single-blind control of equal duration and intensity, each treatment followed by a 20-min typing tutorial. Results: In intent-to-treat analysis (n = 50), primary outcome improved significantly in both groups (p = .0001, d = 1.09 to 1.30), but treatment difference not significant (p = .7). Control children regressed by follow-up (difference p = .034, d = 0.65), but overall difference was not significant (p = .13, d = .47). No measure showed significant treatment differences at treatment end, but one did at follow-up. Children with IQ-achievement discrepancy
Key Words: ADHD vestibular treatment sensory trial placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 SD showed significantly more CMA advantage on three measures. Conclusion: This study illustrates the importance of a credible control condition of equal duration and intensity in trials of novel treatments. CMA treatment cannot be recommended for combined-type ADHD without learning disorder. (J. of Att. Dis. 2008; 11(5) 599-611)